|
How Big Is The Sun?
Polio
eradication: Who cares?
Anaxagoras, who lived in Athens, Greece, had
suggested in 450 B.C. that the sun was so
huge that it was probably larger than the
Peloponnesus, roughly the southern third of
Greece. His critics thought this estimate
excessive and absurd (page 148, Cosmos by
Carl Sagon). Anaxagoras had grossly
under-estimated; he was not suggesting that
sun is one-third of Europe or the Earth, now
we know that the sun is many times bigger
than our Earth.
In the August 2000 issue of the Indian
Pediatrics I had stated: "Paralytic polio
including fatal polio occurring in children
who had received large number of OPV doses
should be a reason for serious concern
regarding the efficacy of OPV including the
improved vaccine with enhanced P3. In
addition, there will always be a risk of
VAPP". All this was stated in the article
entitled 'Polio Eradication Strategy: Need
for Re-appraisal'. More than the contents of
the article, the title was reason for many
raised eye brows and ruffled feathers. WHO
had ordained that polio will be eradicated
globally by end of 2000, and questioning the
strategy in August 2000 was nothing short of
madness.
In the December 2000 issue of the Indian
Pediatrics Dr. Naveen Thacker had stated:
"The observations made by Dr. Yash Paul and
the perceived interpretations are
unfortunate because these come at a critical
time when India is moving towards final
stages of polio eradication. The strategy
for eradication has been well defined by the
Government of India and endorsed by World
Health Organization (WHO) and has proved
successful globally including our
neighboring countries".
The 8th meeting of the National
Certification Committee for Polio
Eradication (NCCPE) held in Delhi during May
2003, was attended by Dr. N.K. Arora,
(convener) Dr. Harsh Vardhan Former Health
Minister, Delhi, Dr. Jacob John and Dr. A.
Parthasarathy among other experts including
a member of Planning Commission. On 11th May
2003, when the Chairman had asked when polio
eradication was envisaged, some had
suggested end of 2003 and some stated
beginning of 2004. When I stated that by
this vaccine and strategy not till 2099,
every one present laughed.
In response to my article entitled 'Can
Polio be eradicated from India through
present Polio Eradication Program?'
published in the August 2003 issue of BMJ-South
Asia Edition, in the October 2003 issue of
BMJ-South Asia Edition Dr. R.N. Srivastava,
Member, Case Classification Committee, NSPS
had stated: "This is in reference to the
"view point" on the subject of polio
eradication in India by Dr. Yash Paul. Not
many would agree with his concern that
'polio free India still remains a distant
dream.' Majority of the experts believe that
polio eradication in our country is just
round the corner despite setbacks and
difficulties". In the same issue Dr. Jay
Wenger, Project Manager, NPSP-WHO, India had
stated: "Thus, the outbreak of 2002, and the
problems of polio eradication were not
caused by failure of OPV or occurrence of
VAPP, but failure to vaccinate children
adequately."
In the November 2003 issue of the Indian
Pediatrics Dr. Jacob John had stated: "Dr.
Paul disagrees with my assessment that the
failure to eradicate wild viruses is due to
inadequate vaccine coverage." He had further
stated: "I disagree with Dr. Paul's
audacious prediction that India will not
succeed to eradicate polio unless his three
directives are followed. His first directive
to take appropriate remedial measures for
the high incidence of vaccine failure is
superfluous."
As part of global polio eradication, polio
eradication program was launched in India in
1995. In addition to routine OPV
vaccination, two rounds of pulse polio
immunization were introduced. In 1999
quantity of P3 vaccine viruses was increased
from 500,000 to 600,000 per dose of two
drops of OPV, and number of vaccination
rounds were increased to 5-6 rounds per year
for some states. In 2005 monovalent
OPV1(mOPV1) and later monovalent OPV3(mOPV3)
were introduced in Uttar Pradesh. It was
stated that monovalent vaccines are 2 - 3
times more effective than trivalent oral
polio vaccines. In year 2007 monovalent
OPV1, and OPV3 were administered in Bihar
also in addition to trivalent oral polio
vaccine (tOPV). In 2007, number of
vaccination rounds for Uttar Pradesh was
increased to a round every month. But polio
has not been eradicated from India.
In the July 2005 issue of the Indian
Pediatrics I had stated: "It can be said
that present eradication program ensures
that polio is not eradicated. Polio cases
will continue to occur because of vaccine
failure and due to mutant vaccine
polioviruses. Infected immunocompromised
children will continue to spread for
prolonged period in the community wild as
well as mutant vaccine polioviruses".
Following observations can provide clues to
the reasons for failure of OPV to eradicate
polio from India.
1. Differential response to OPV.
Pulse polio immunization was launched in
India in 1995. Some states became polio free
by 1997 and some became polio free slightly
later. No polio cases have been reported
from these states. Uttar Pradesh and Bihar
have never been polio free during this
period, while polio incidence declined in
rest of the country.
2. Incidence of vaccine failure is on rise.
In a study by Ahuja et al. for 1989 - 1994
period, it was reported that among polio
cases, incidence was 14% in 1989 and
increased to 22.9% in 1994 who had received
three or more doses of OPV(1). In Rajasthan,
percentage of polio cases who had received
five or more doses of OPV was 32.7% in
1999(2) and 58.6% in 2000(3). These
observations are substatiated by the data in
Table 1.
|
Table - 1 Number of OPV
doses received by polio cases,
1998-2007 |
|
OPV Doses |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
|
0 Dose |
15% |
14% |
14% |
9% |
16% |
14% |
4% |
0% |
3% |
1% |
|
1 - 3 doses |
47% |
45% |
28% |
31% |
41% |
35% |
11% |
11% |
10% |
3% |
|
4 - 7 doses |
32% |
34% |
35% |
41% |
33% |
34% |
41% |
44% |
22% |
12% |
|
> 7 dose |
7% |
8% |
23% |
18% |
11% |
17% |
44% |
45% |
65% |
85% |
|
Source: www.npspindia.org,
assessed on 2nd Feb., 2008 |
3. VAPP after subsequent dose.
Risk of VAPP is highest with the first dose
of OPV, but, in India majority of VAPP cases
occurred after subsequent OPV doses.
4. Increase in polio cases by WP3.
Grassly et al. had stated that children from
Bihar show better response to OPV3(4). Now
more cases of polio by WP3 are occurring, in
Bihar.
It is difficult to understand how the
experts had envisaged polio eradication by
OPV. On the other hand it is difficult to
believe that the experts are unable to
understand that polio cannot be eradicated
by the current polio vaccines. May be they
understand the reality but do not wish to
acknowledge due to the reasons best known to
them.
P.S.
Should there be any reasons for concern?
In an Editorial in the May 2008 issue of the
Indian Pediatrics Dr. Roland W. Sutter, Dr.
Hamid Jafari and Dr. Bruce Aylward have
stated: "Do we need a change in the polio
eradication strategies? The strategies have
eliminated polio from all but two states in
India (and more than 120 countries
globally)." They have stated further: "Uttar
Pradesh may have already interrupted
poliovirus type 1 transmission and also
appears to be on track to possibly interrupt
type 3 transmission in 2008."
Thus, there should be no reason for us to
even think that polio eradication is evading
us. But, the actual data by NPSP may be a
reason for concern as can be seen in Table
2. It can be seen that during 1999 and
onwards, number of polio cases in November
and December 2007 and January to April 2008
have been highest, even higher than those
which occurred in 2002, when there were 1600
polio cases.
|
Table 2 Month-wise Polio
Cases |
|
Month |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
January |
112 |
36 |
36 |
7 |
18 |
51 |
4 |
10 |
8 |
24 |
112 |
|
February |
32 |
22 |
10 |
1 |
8 |
16 |
3 |
5 |
9 |
14 |
53 |
|
March |
42 |
11 |
10 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
14 |
41 |
|
April |
26 |
8 |
20 |
3 |
16 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
14 |
41 |
|
May |
49 |
39 |
6 |
4 |
42 |
5 |
9 |
2 |
36 |
32 |
32 |
|
June |
118 |
69 |
8 |
13 |
117 |
7 |
14 |
6 |
76 |
30 |
19 |
|
July |
324 |
142 |
25 |
30 |
251 |
25 |
13 |
3 |
121 |
64 |
|
|
August |
418 |
187 |
39 |
62 |
280 |
29 |
18 |
6 |
114 |
78 |
|
|
September |
283 |
193 |
32 |
33 |
334 |
30 |
18 |
14 |
137 |
82 |
|
|
October |
170 |
195 |
31 |
38 |
247 |
20 |
32 |
7 |
71 |
98 |
|
|
November |
226 |
155 |
31 |
43 |
180 |
16 |
14 |
7 |
55 |
203 |
|
|
December |
134 |
69 |
17 |
31 |
100 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
28 |
221 |
|
|
Total |
1934 |
1126 |
265 |
268 |
1600 |
225 |
134 |
66 |
676 |
874 |
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source : www.npspindia.org as on
12.07.08 p. 4 |
-Yash
Paul,
Jaipur, India.
E-mail :
dryashpaul2003@yahoo.com
References :
1.
Ahuja B, Gupta VK, Tyagi A. Paralytic
poliomyelitis (1989 - 1994): report from a
Sentinel Center. Indian Pediatr 1996; 33:
734 - 745.
2. Paul
Y. Polio Eradication Strategy: Need for
Re-appraisal. Indian Pediatr 2000; 37: 913 -
916.
3. Paul
Y. Accuracy of the national polio
surveillance project data in Rajasthan.
Indian J Pediatr 2002; 69: 667 - 673.
4.
Grassly NC, Fraser C, Wenger J. Deshpande M,
Sutter RW, Heymann DL, et al. New strategies
for the elimination of polio from India.
Science 2006; 314: 1150 - 1153. |