|

Puneet Kumar
Role of Induced Hypothermia in Management of
Perinatal Asphyxia: Current status
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a
common cause of neonatal deaths and
neurodevelopmental abnormalities in survivors.
In fact, it contributes to 23% of the four
million neonatal deaths every year globally (1).
In the absence of any specific therapy,
currently the management of HIE consists of
maintaining physiological parameters within the
normal range and treating seizures with
anticonvulsants. Development of better
therapeutic strategies for HIE has always been a
hot topic of research in neonatology. Although
several novel pharmacological agents have been
found to be effective in animal models (2-4),
the results could not be replicated in human
studies (5, 6). Early evidence in favour of
induced hypothermia, however, is stronger.
Today, research on induced hypothermia is
focused on fine-tuning the therapeutic
strategies (selection of patients, whole-body or
selective head cooling, timing of hypothermia,
degree of hypothermia, timing and speed of
rewarming, etc.). The present article summarizes
the current status of induced hypothermia in the
management of HIE.
Mechanisms of action
Experimental studies have shown that a severe
perinatal hypoxic-ischemic insult results in an
evolving process of adverse biochemical events
that include increased levels of
neurotransmitters, excessive production of free
radicals, increased intracellular calcium, and
stimulation of inflammatory mediators and
messengers that initiate apoptotic cell death.
Alterations in cerebral energy metabolism can
also be observed during and following such an
insult. Cerebral metabolism is impaired and
cerebral high-energy phosphate levels fall
precipitously. Following termination of the
insult, cerebral energy metabolism initially
recovers, but then deteriorates 624 hours
later. Although the secondary phase of impaired
cerebral energy metabolism resolves after about
72 hours, a persistent disturbance may be
detected for several months (7, 8).
Studies in adult and newborn animals have shown
that a reduction of body temperature of 34°C
after cerebral insults is associated with
improved histological and behavioral outcome
(9-11). Several mechanisms may help explain
these benefits: the increases in extracellular
glutamate and free radical and nitric oxide
synthesis are suppressed (12, 13), cerebral
energy phosphates are preserved and cerebral
alkalosis and lactate reduced (14, 15). Mild
hypothermia may also suppress the activation of
microglia (16, 17). These changes may preserve
cerebral energy metabolism, reduce cytotoxic
cerebral edema and intracranial pressure and
inhibit apoptosis (18). Thus, in contrast to
pharmacological agents, which tend to target
only one step in the process that leads to brain
injury, hypothermia inhibits many steps in the
biochemical cascade that produces severe brain
injury after hypoxia-ischemia.
Hoeger et al (19) have suggested that
hypothermia is not able to prevent morphological
changes in the brain, but able to preserve brain
functions very well. That indicates that with
hypothermia, the neurological deficits are
well-compensated functionally in affected
newborn animal models.
Selective or whole body cooling
Selective head cooling seems to be an
attractive option, as the therapy is directed
towards the target organ, thus reducing the
potential adverse effects on other organs. Early
experimental studies (20) reported beneficial
results. One of the large key human trials on
selective head cooling was published in Lancet
in 2005 (21). Popularly known as the cool-cap
study, this was a multicentre controlled trial
with 234 term infants with moderate or severe
HIE plus abnormal amplitude integrated
encephalography (aEEG), randomized to either
head cooling for 72 hours within 6 hours of
birth or conventional care. The primary outcome
was death or severe disability at 18 months.
Although the study did not demonstrate overall
significant difference in these outcomes, in a
subset of babies with less severe aEEG changes,
selective head cooling did provide significant
benefit.
However, it is uncertain whether head cooling
alone effectively lowers deep brain temperature.
In anaesthetized piglets, which have a much
smaller head than the human newborn infant, it
was possible to cool the basal ganglia 5°C more
than rectal temperature (22). In adults, a steep
temperature gradient has been observed between
the surface of the head and deep brain
structures and the deep brain temperature
remains very close to core temperature even when
extreme cold is applied to the surface of the
head (23). The possibility of temperature
gradients within the brain and the importance of
damage to deep structures in causing severe
neurodevelopmental impairment (24) and the lack
of precise, non-invasive methods for measuring
regional brain temperature pose major
difficulties with selective head cooling. In
fact, even in the landmark cool cap study
(21), the authors used mild systemic
hypothermia (Rectal temp 34-35ΊC) in the
brain-cooled group of babies.
Timing of hypothermia
Since cerebral damage starts soon after
hypoxic-ischemic insult, it is plausible that
therapy should start early to prevent/minimize
damage. Current consensus is that the maximum
benefit occurs when treatment is started within
six hours of the insult (9, 25), although
limited neuroprotection has been observed when
hypothermia is started as late as 12 hours.
Therefore, hypothermic treatment following
perinatal asphyxia is to be started as soon as
practically possible. The benefit may be minimal
if treatment is delayed beyond six hours after
birth.
Duration of Hypothermia
Duration of hypothermia varies with timing of
initiation of hypothermia, degree of hypothermia
and severity of hypoxic-ischemic insult. Most
experimental studies have employed moderate
hypothermia for at least 12-24 hours for
favourable outcome. However, up to 72 hours of
hypothermia may be required if the interval
before inducing hypothermia is prolonged or
milder degree of hypothermia is used (20). In
fact, it has been seen in some studies that a
rebound rise in epileptiform activity in fetal
lambs (20) and in intracranial pressure in
adults with stroke (26) can occur when
hypothermia is discontinued before 72 hours.
Efficacy
Experimental studies on animal models have shown
that a reduction of body temperature of 34°C
after cerebral insults is associated with
improved histological and behavioral outcome
(9-11). Preliminary studies in adults of whole
body hypothermia following head injury (27),
cardiac arrest (28-30) and stroke (26) also
suggested benefit. In neonates, hypothermia was
first reported as therapy for resuscitation,
before modern resuscitation techniques were
introduced (31-33). It was soon realized that
induced hypothermia can be beneficial in
minimizing secondary brain injury in neonates
who have suffered perinatal asphyxia. Pilot
studies of head cooling combined with mild whole
body hypothermia and of moderate whole body
cooling to 33.5°C in infants with encephalopathy
reported favourable results. More recently,
results of large multicentre controlled trials
have been published (21, 34-36).
Debillon et al (34) conducted a small pilot
study on 25 infants (median postmenstrual age 38
weeks, 19 Sarnat II and six Sarnat III). Out of
25 babies, 18 survived, including 13 (72%) with
normal cerebral signal by MRI.
Eicher et al (35) conducted a multicentre,
randomized controlled trial where 32 babies in
intervention group were cooled to 33ΊC within 6
hours of birth or hypoxic event (for 48 hours).
The outcome (death and severe disability) was
favourable. The entry criteria selected a
severely affected group of neonates, with 77%
Sarnat stage III. Ten hypothermia (10/32, 31%)
and 14 normothermia (14/33, 42%) patients
expired. Controlling for treatment group,
outborn infants were significantly more likely
to die than hypoxic-ischemic infants born in
participating tertiary care centers (odds ratio
10.7, 95% confidence interval 1.3-90). Severely
abnormal motor scores (Psychomotor Development
Index < 70) were recorded in 64% of normothermia
patients and in 24% of hypothermia patients. The
combined outcome of death or severe motor scores
yielded fewer bad outcomes in the hypothermia
group (52%) than the normothermia group (84%) (P
= 0.019). Although these results need to be
validated in a large clinical trial, this pilot
trial provided important data for clinical trial
design of hypothermia treatment in neonatal
hypoxic-ischemic injury.
Shankaran et al (36) conducted a large
multicentre trial of whole body hypothermia for
HIE. A total of 208 infants (≥ 36 weeks
gestation, age <6 hours, cord pH ≤ 7.0 in first
hour of life or a history of perinatal event
requiring resuscitation at birth) were
randomized into the trial. The babies in the
hypothermia group were cooled within 45 minutes
to a target of 33.5ΊC for 72 hours. The primary
outcome of the study was death or severe
disability at 18 months of age. The risk of
death and moderate/ severe disability was 45% in
the hypothermia, whereas it was 62% in the
normothermia group. Although not powered to test
these secondary outcomes, whole-body hypothermia
in infants with encephalopathy was safe and was
associated with a consistent trend for
decreasing frequency of each of the components
of disability.
TOBY study (37) is an ongoing a multi-centre,
prospective, randomised study of term infants
after perinatal asphyxia comparing those
allocated to "intensive care plus total body
cooling for 72 hours" with those allocated to
"intensive care without cooling". At least 236
babies are being recruited. Outcomes will be
assessed at 18 months of age using neurological
and neurodevelopmental testing methods.
Moreover, long-term follow-up to at least 6
years of age may also be done, as a secondary
study, for detailed assessment of intellectual
function.
Recently a systematic review of good-quality
randomized trials on hypothermia in HIE has been
published (38). It concluded that the combined
outcome of death or neurodevelopmental
disability in childhood was reduced in infants
receiving hypothermia compared with control
infants (4 studies including 497 infants;
relative risk, 0.76, 95% confidence interval,
0.65-0.88; number needed to treat, 6; 95%
confidence interval, 4-14), as were death and
moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disability
when analyzed separately.
The recent Cochrane review (39) also concluded
that there is evidence from the eight randomized
controlled trials (n = 638) that therapeutic
hypothermia is beneficial to term newborns with
hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Cooling reduces
mortality without increasing major disability in
survivors. The benefits of cooling on survival
and neurodevelopment outweigh the short-term
adverse effects. However, it cautioned that
results from ongoing trials (n= 829) may alter
the conclusions. Further trials to determine the
appropriate method of providing therapeutic
hypothermia, including comparison of whole body
with selective head cooling with mild systemic
hypothermia, are also required.
Most studies till date have focused on term
babies, as hypothermia is a well known adverse
risk factor in preterm babies. However, very
recently there is evidence from an experimental
study that selective head cooling may be
beneficial even in preterms (40).
Safety
The risk of adverse effects of hypothermia
is a critical issue, given the poor outcome
conventionally associated with hypothermia (41).
Impaired cardiac function, disordered
coagulation and increased sepsis have been
reported with profound hypothermia.
Thrombocytopenia, hypokalemia and increased
sepsis have been noted in studies of hypothermia
to 33°C in adults, but these were not associated
with an adverse outcome (26). The metabolic rate
is reduced during hypothermia and this results
in bradycardia and prolonged PR and QT
intervals. However, significant arrhythmia has
only been reported in adults with head injury
when the rectal temperature is less than 32°C
(42), whereas most studies on HIE in newborn
have used moderate hypothermia (33-34ΊC).
No clinically significant adverse effects due to
cooling were observed in the recent pilot
studies of whole body (34-36, 43-45) and
selective head cooling (21, 46) following
encephalopathy. As expected, the heart rate
reduced to below 100 bpm with cooling but this
was not accompanied by arrhythmia, and the blood
pressure and perfusion were maintained. Very
recently, Compagnoni et al (47) reported safety
of even deep hypothermia (30-33ΊC) in
moderate-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
in newborn term infants.
Challenges
Role of induced hypothermia in management of
these patients is still evolving. Large,
multicentre, controlled trials with long term
follow up are needed to validate results of
published studies. Many questions still need
more accurate answers. Which patients respond
best to this treatment? What is the best method
of cooling? What should be the timing and speed
of rewarming? Does it improve long-term outcome?
However, as Laing (48) said, perhaps the most
challenging of all is the ethical requirement of
informed parental consent for randomized
studies: if obtaining fully informed consent
takes a few hours, causing the window of
opportunity to be lost, is it ethical to embark
on this new form of treatment without parental
consent?
Early identification of infants at risk of
perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy is also
difficult. Perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy is
reported to occur in between one and two infants
per thousand deliveries in developed countries,
and much more frequently in countries without
adequate obstetric facilities. Early
identification by clinical features of infants
at risk of developing encephalopathy is
difficult. Fetal heart rate patterns are not
very helpful (49, 50) and neither the Apgar
scores recorded immediately after birth (51, 52)
nor umbilical cord blood gas analysis (53, 54)
are good predictors of the likelihood or
severity of post asphyxial encephalopathy. Most
experts, however, agree that a continuing need
for resuscitation and acidaemia with a cord
blood pH < 7.0, are useful features of perinatal
asphyxia.
The extremely high cost of the equipment and the
need to rigorously monitor and control the
temperatures limits the use of this modality for
most settings in developing countries (55).
Procedural difficulties requiring repeated
revisions in the cooling techniques have earlier
been reported (56). Also, the quantum of benefit
of this intervention is modest and a direct
cost-benefit analysis is not available.
Another big challenge is that such studies
cannot be blinded or placebo-controlled. There
is always a possibility of bias in studies
because of this. Parents of infants randomized
to hypothermia group may have some faith in the
protective effect of this new treatment and
thus may be more reluctant in giving consent to
withdrawal of active intensive neonatal care
(48).
Puneet Kumar
Kumar Child Clinic, Dwarka, New Delhi
References
1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million
neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet, 2005;
365: 891-900.
2. Palmer C, Vannucci RC, Towfighi J. Reduction
of perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage with
allopurinol. Pediatr Res. 1990; 27:3326.
3. Gunn AJ, Williams CE, Mallard EC, et al.
Flunarizine, a calcium channel antagonist, is
partially prophylactically neuroprotective in
hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the fetal
sheep. Pediatr Res. 1994; 35:65763.
4. Tuor UI. Glucocorticoids and the prevention
of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Neurosci
Biobehav. 1997; 21:1759.
5. Levene MI, Gibson NA, Fenton AC, et al. The
use of a calcium-channel blocker, nicardipine,
for severely asphyxiated newborn infants. Dev
Med Child Neurol. 1990; 32:56774.
6. Evans DJ, Levene MI. Anticonvulsants for
preventing mortality and morbidity in full term
newborns with perinatal asphyxia. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2001:CD001240.
7. Robertson NJ, Cox IJ, Cowan FM, et al.
Cerebral intracellular lactic alkalosis
persisting months after neonatal encephalopathy
measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Pediatr Res. 1999; 46:28796.
8. Hanrahan JD, Cox IJ, Edwards AD, et al.
Persistent increases in cerebral lactate
concentration after birth asphyxia. Pediatr Res.
1998; 44:30411.
9. Colbourne F, Corbett D. Delayed postischemic
hypothermia: a six month survival study using
behavioral and histological assessments of
neuroprotection. J Neurosci. 1995; 15:725060.
10. Bona E, Hagberg H, Loberg EM, Bagenholm R,
Thoresen M. Protective effects of moderate
hypothermia after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia:
short- and long-term outcome. Pediatr Res. 1998;
43:73845.
11. Wagner BP, Nedelcu J, Martin E. Delayed
postischemic hypothermia improves long-term
behavioral outcome after cerebral
hypoxia-ischemia in neonatal rats. Pediatr Res.
2002; 51:35460.
12. Thoresen M, Satas S, Puka-Sundvall M, et al.
Post-hypoxic hypothermia reduces cerebrocortical
release of NO and excitotoxins. Neuroreport.
1997; 8:335962.
13. Globus MY, Busto R, Lin B, et al. Detection
of free radical activity during transient global
ischemia and recirculation: effects of
intraischemic brain temperature modulation. J
Neurochem. 1995; 65:12506.
14. Amess PN, Penrice J, Cady EB, et al. Mild
hypothermia after severe transient
hypoxia-ischemia reduces the delayed rise in
cerebral lactate in the newborn piglet. Pediatr
Res. 1997; 41:8038.
15. Thoresen M, Penrice J, Lorek A, et al. Mild
hypothermia after severe transient
hypoxia-ischemia ameliorates delayed cerebral
energy failure in the newborn piglet. Pediatr
Res. 1995; 37:66770.
16. Kumar K, Evans AT. Effect of hypothermia on
microglial reaction in ischemic brain.
Neuroreport. 1997; 8:94750.
17. Si QS, Nakamura Y, Kataoka K. Hypothermic
suppression of microglial activation in culture:
inhibition of cell proliferation and production
of nitric oxide and superoxide. Neuroscience.
1997; 81:2239.
18. Roka A, Vasarhelvi B, Bodrogi E, et al.
Changes in laboratory parameters indicating cell
necrosis and organ dysfunction in asphyxiated
neonates on moderate systemic hypothermia. Acta
Pediatr, 2007: 96(8):1118-21.
19. Hoeger H, Engidawork E, Stolzlechner D, et
al. Long-term effect of moderate and profound
hypothermia on morphology, neurological,
cognitive and behavioural functions in a rat
model of perinatal asphyxia. Amino acids, 2006;
31(4):385-96.
20. Gunn AJ, Gunn TR, de Haan HH, et al.
Dramatic neuronal rescue with prolonged
selective head cooling after ischemia in fetal
lambs. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99:24856.
21. Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, et al.
Selective head cooling with mild systemic
hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy:
multicentre randomised trial. Lancet, 2005;
365:66370.
22. Tooley J, Satas S, Eagle R, et al.
Significant selective head cooling can be
maintained long-term after global hypoxia
ischemia in newborn piglets. Pediatrics. 2002;
109:6439.
23. Mellergard P. Monitoring of rectal,
epidural, and intraventricular temperature in
neurosurgical patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl
(Wien). 1994; 60:4857.
24. Rutherford M, Pennock J, Schwieso J, Cowan
F, Dubowitz L. Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy:
early and late magnetic resonance imaging
findings in relation to outcome. Arch Dis Child
Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996; 75:F14551.
25. Taylor DL, Mehmet H, Cady EB, et al.
Improved neuroprotection with hypothermia
delayed by 6 hours following cerebral
hypoxia-ischemia in the 14-day-old rat. Pediatr
Res. 2002; 51:139.
26. Schwab S, Schwarz S, Spranger M, et al.
Moderate hypothermia in the treatment of
patients with severe middle cerebral artery
infarction. Stroke. 1998; 29:24616.
27. Marion DW, Penrod LE, Kelsey SF, Obrist WD,
Kochanek PM, Palmer AM, Wisniewski SR, DeKosky
ST. Treatment of traumatic brain injury with
moderate hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 1997;
336:5406.
28. Bernard SA, Jones BM, Horne MK. Clinical
trial of induced hypothermia in comatose
survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann
Emerg Med. 1997; 30:14653.
29. Safar PJ, Kochanek PM. Therapeutic
hypothermia after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med.
2002; 346:6123.
30. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, Jones BM,
Silvester W, Gutteridge G, Smith K. Treatment of
comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med.
2002; 346:55763.
31. Dawes GS, Mott JC, Shelly HJ. Hypothermia in
resuscitation of the newborn. Br Med J.
1963;2(5367):1266.
32. Varga K, Nyiro L, Veghelyi P. Data on
resuscitation of asphyxic newborn infants by
means of closed chest massage, transfusion into
the umbilical vein and hypothermia. Orv Hetil.
1964; 105:928-30.
33. Hanquet M. Hypothermia in resuscitation.
Acta Chir Belg. 1964; 63: Suppl 1:248-70.
34. Debillon T, Daoud P, Durand P, et al.
Whole-body cooling after perinatal asphyxia: a
pilot study in term neonates. Dev Med Child
Neurol, 2003: 45(1):17-23.
35. Eicher DJ, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, et al.
Moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy:
efficacy outcomes. Pediatr Neurol. 2005;
32:117.
36. Shankaran S, Pappas A, Laptook AR, et al,
for the National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development Neonatal Research Network.
Outcomes of safety and effectiveness in a
multicenter randomized, controlled trial of
whole-body hypothermia for neonatal
hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics,
2008: 122(4):e791-8.
37. Azzopardi D, Brocklehurst P, Edwards D; TOBY
Study Group. The TOBY Study. Whole body
hypothermia for the treatment of perinatal
asphyxial encephalopathy: a randomised
controlled trial. BMC Pediatr, 2008: 8:17.
38. Shah PS, Ohlsson A, Perlman M. Hypothermia
to treat neonatal hypoxic ischemic
encephalopathy: systematic review. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med, 2007: 161(10):951-8.
39. Jacobs S, Hunt R, Tarnow-Mordi W, et al.
Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic
encephalopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,
2007; 4: CD003311.
40. George S, Scotter J, Dean JM, et al. Induced
cerebral hypothermia reduces post-hypoxic loss
of phenotypic striatal neurons in preterm fetal
sheep. Exp Neurol, 2007: 203(1):137-47.
41. Mann TP, Elliott RIK. Neonatal cold injury
due to accidental exposure to cold. Lancet.
1957: 22934.
42. Clifton GL, Allen S, Berry J, et al.
Systemic hypothermia in treatment of brain
injury. J Neurotrauma. 1992: S48795.
43. Thoresen M, Whitelaw A. Cardiovascular
changes during mild therapeutic hypothermia and
rewarming in infants with hypoxic-ischemic
encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 2000; 106:929.
44. Azzopardi D, Robertson NJ, Cowan FM, et al.
Pilot study of treatment with whole body
hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy.
Pediatrics. 2000; 106:68494.
45. Eicher DJ, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, et al.
Moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy:
safety outcomes. Pediatr Neurol. 2005; 32:18-24.
46. Battin MR, Penrice J, Gunn TR, et al.
Treatment of term infants with head cooling and
mild systemic hypothermia (35.0 degrees C and
34.5 degrees C) after perinatal asphyxia.
Pediatrics, 2003; 111(2):244-51.
47. Compagnoni G, Bottura C, Cavallaro G, et al.
Safety of deep hypothermia in treating neonatal
asphyxia. Neonatology, 2008: 93(4):230-5.
48. Laing IA. How has research in the last five
years changed my clinical practice? Arch Dis
Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2005: 90: F364-F367.
49. Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, et al.
Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring
in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med.
1996; 334:6138.
50. Spencer JA, Badawi N, Burton P, et al. The
intrapartum CTG prior to neonatal encephalopathy
at term: a case-control study. Br J Obstet
Gynaecol. 1997; 104:258.
51. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Apgar scores as
predictors of chronic neurologic disability.
Pediatrics. 1981; 68:3644.
52. Levene MI, Sands C, Grindulis H, Moore JR.
Comparison of two methods of predicting outcome
in perinatal asphyxia. Lancet. 1986; 1:679.
53. Perlman JM, Risser R. Can asphyxiated
infants at risk for neonatal seizures be rapidly
identified by current high-risk markers?
Pediatrics. 1996; 97:45662.
54. Ekert P, Perlman M, Steinlin M, et al.
Predicting the outcome of postasphyxial
hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy within 4 hours
of birth. J Pediatr. 1997; 131:6137.
55. Shah D. Therapeutic Hypothermia for Neonatal
Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy. Indian
Pediatrics 2008; 45: 913-914.
56. Horn AR, Woods DL, Thompson C, et al.
Selective cerebral hypothermia for post-hypoxic
neuroprotection in neonates using a solid ice
cap. S Afr Med J 2006; 96: 976-981.
|